| 9,926 | 532 | 205 |
| 下载次数 | 被引频次 | 阅读次数 |
企业绩效评价对监测企业经营情况、监控经营风险、判断战略实施效果具有重要意义,绩效评价准确及时可以在战略制定和博弈中抢占优势。然而,精准科学量化绩效是企业普遍面临的棘手难题,尤其是竞争激烈且行业特性明显的企业。在白酒产业供给侧结构性改革、消费结构升级和产业政策解禁等背景下,准确量化绩效对企业就有限资源提高消费群体吸引力、经营管理水平和抗风险韧性具有重要意义,为实现企业可持续发展提供了新思路。研究在综合分析企业绩效评价指标选取、量化方法、指标关联程度等基础上,借鉴利益相关者理论、企业社会责任和白酒行业特性对平衡计分卡进行改进,从财务绩效、客户及社会绩效、内部管理及创新绩效三个层面共28个指标建立白酒企业绩效评价指标体系。其次,为提高企业绩效评价精确性,研究采用熵权法对指标客观赋权,并利用向量夹角余弦距离和灰色关联法对传统TOPSIS法进行改进,建立了熵权改进TOPSIS评价模型。该模型在赋权基础上,创新性地运用向量夹角余弦距离替代欧式距离判断样本间的相似度,弥补欧式距离直线式计算处理数据信息造成的损失,再结合灰色关联理论构建相对贴近度,反映了绩效内部变化趋势与理想绩效的联系,并选取最具行业特色、百亿规模以上的三个白酒企业进行算例分析。研究表明:在影响白酒企业绩效评价的各项指标中,营业净利率、科研人员率、质量达标率三项指标影响最强,酿酒增长率、员工培训、员工工资增长率三项指标影响最弱;客户及社会绩效维度发展不均已成为判断白酒企业绩效水平的关键,财务绩效发展比较均匀,并没有拉开显著差距;熵权改进TOPSIS法能较好的反映企业绩效情况,验证了该方法判断白酒企业绩效优劣的合理性和实用性。最后,研究针对算例分析结果及模型运用提出一般性建议,并针对百亿规模以上的企业提出相关建议。
Abstract:The enterprise performance evaluation is of great significance to monitor the enterprise operation, monitor the operation risk and judge the implementation effect of the strategy. Accurate and timely performance evaluation can preempt the advantage in strategy formulation and game. However, precise and scientific quantification of performance is a common difficulty faced by enterprises, especially those enterprises with fierce competition and obvious industry characteristics. Under the background of supply-side structural reform, consumption structure upgrading and industrial policy lifting, etc. accurate quantification of performance is of great significance for enterprises to improve the attractiveness of consumer groups, the level of operation and management, and the resilience against risks with respect to limited resources. This provides a new idea for realizing the sustainable development of enterprises. Based on the comprehensive analysis of the selection of corporate performance evaluation indicators, quantitative methods, and the degree of indicator relevance, the research draws on stakeholder theory, corporate social responsibility and the characteristics of the liquor industry to improve the balanced scorecard. This paper establishes the index system of enterprise performance evaluation for liquor enterprises from 28 indicators in three levels: financial performance,customer and social performance, internal management and innovation performance. Furthermore, in order to improve the accuracy of enterprise performance evaluation, the entropy weight method is used to objectively assign weights to indexes, and the included Angle cosine distance and gray correlation method are used to improve the traditional TOPSIS method, and the improved TOPSIS evaluation model of entropy weight is established. Based on weighting, the model innovatively uses the included angle cosine distance to replace the Euclidean distance to judge the similarity between samples and make up for the loss caused by the linear calculation of Euclidean distance. Then, the relative closeness degree is set up in combination with the grey correlation theory, which reflects the relationship between the internal variation trend of performance and the ideal performance. Three liquor enterprises with industry characteristics and over CNY10 billion revenues are selected for example analysis. The research shows that: among the indicators that affect the performance evaluation of liquor enterprises, the three indicators of operating net interest rate, research staff rate and quality up to standard rate have the strongest influence. Three indicators: distilling growth rate, employee training, employee salary growth rate have the weakest impact. Second, uneven development of customer and social performance dimensions have become the key to judge the performance level of liquor enterprises, and the development of financial performance is relatively uniform without significant gap. The improved TOPSIS method of entropy weight can reflect the performance of enterprises well and verify the rationality and practicability of the method to judge the performance of liquor enterprises. Finally, the paper puts forward general suggestions for the analysis results and the application of the model, and puts forward relevant suggestions for enterprises with a scale of over CNY10 billion.
[1]吕立志.股份公司产生和发展的原因及作用——读《资本论》体会[J].江苏教育学院学报(社会科学版),1997(3):41-43.
[2]高健.浅谈企业财务绩效评价[J].山西财经大学学报,2007(S1):185.
[3]刘倩.企业财务绩效评价模型构建——基于主成分分析法[J].生产力研究,2010(6):249-250.
[4]杨博文,张天,陈丽壮.中国风电上市公司财务绩效评价研究[J].税务与经济,2012(1):63-67.
[5]吕振君,王伟.基于因子和聚类分析法的中国物流上市公司财务绩效评价研究[J].经济研究参考,2013(23):93-95.
[6]金英伟,张敏.上市出版企业财务绩效评价研究[J].现代出版,2019(2):31-34.
[7]许庆瑞,王勇,郑刚.业绩评价理论:进展与争论[J].科研管理,2002(2):50-56.
[8] Kaplan, Norton. The Balanced Scorecard-Measures That Drive[J]. Harvard Business Review, 1992(1):71-79.
[9] Arefeh Rabbani, Mahmoud Zamani, Abdolreza Yazdani-Chamzini, Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas.Proposing a new integrated model based on sustainability balanced scorecard(SBSC)and MCDM approaches by using linguistic variables for the performance evaluation of oil producing companies[J].Expert Systems With Applications, 2014(16):7316-7327.
[10] Ming-Tsang Lu, Chao-Che Hsu, James J. H. Liou, Huai-Wei Lo. A hybrid MCDM and sustainability-balanced scorecard model to establish sustainable performance evaluation for international airports[J]. Journal of Air Transport Management, 2018(AUG):9-19.
[11]罗锦珍.平衡计分卡在中小企业绩效管理中的应用研究[J].湖南社会科学,2019(1):120-125.
[12]张琦,刘克.基于利益相关者理论的企业绩效评价指标体系[J].系统工程,2016(6):155-158.
[13]陈茜,田治威.共生理论视角下创新区内企业绩效评估与审计[J].河南社会科学,2017(8):99-106.
[14]曾佑新,王斌.基于绿色供应链的报废汽车企业绩效评价研究[J].工业技术经济,2017(4):98-106.
[15]安景文,朱伟,李松林,等.基于拓展型BSC-FANP模型的煤炭企业绩效评价[J].统计与决策,2018(18):181-184.
[16]李烨,曹梅,龙梦琦.资源型企业循环经济评价指标体系构建与实例分析[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2016(S1):84-89.
[17]仝自强,李鹏翔,杨磊.商业模式创新的绩效评价体系演化研究——以海尔集团为例[J].管理现代化,2020(3):43-46.
[18]张冰秋.新三板企业绩效评价体系构建与实证[J].统计与决策,2016(24):186-188.
[19]孟志华.基于区间数相似度的企业运营绩效评价指标体系构建[J].统计与决策,2017(20):177-180.
[20]赵晋琳,袁帅.创业板公司绩效的模糊综合评价[J].统计与决策,2019(12):181-184.
[21]杜红艳.物流企业创新绩效评价模型构建与运用[J].统计与决策,2017(19):181-184.
[22]吴泓,张慧芹,黄贝欣.中国文化创意企业经营绩效分析——基于A股上市公司面板数据的实证研究[J].现代经济探讨,2018(12):78-83.
[23]程森.基于熵值法的水利施工企业绩效考核KPI设计方法[J].山东大学学报(工学版),2020(4):80-84.
[24]张彦霞,肖清泰,肖汉杰,等.组合权重优化的企业财务绩效可变模糊综合评价模型[J].数学的实践与认识,2018(3):64-74.
[25]谢琨,庞凤娇,陈高敏,等.我国钢铁企业绿色技术创新绩效评价研究[J].价格理论与实践,2019(9):153-156.
[26]孙晓东,焦玥,胡劲松.基于灰色关联度和理想解法的决策方法研究[J].中国管理科学,2005(4):63-68.
[27]孙海英,王宪杰.基于灰色关联分析的熵权法在企业绩效评价中的应用[J].黑龙江大学自然科学学报,2016(5):581-586.
[28]李守林,赵瑞,陈丽华.基于灰色关联分析和TOPSIS的物流企业创新绩效评价[J].工业技术经济,2018(4):12-21.
[29]刘军琦,孙璐,刘兵.利用TOPSIS法评价企业财务绩效:原理与实证分析[J].四川大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2001(3):42-46.
[30]常志朋,程龙生,刘家树.基于马田系统与TOPSIS的区间数多属性决策方法[J].系统工程理论与实践,2014(1):168-175.
[31]陈为公,闫红,刘艳,等.基于改进TOPSIS法的装配式建筑部品供应商选择[J].土木工程与管理学报,2019(2):12-19.
[32]王墨兰,马丽萍.中国白酒品牌视觉形象与企业文化对接机制研究[J].学术交流,2013(9):79-82.
[33]马健.中国白酒的文化形象认同危机与酒道传播系统重构[J].系统科学学报,2019(2):86-91.
[34]翁靓,曾绍伦.白酒上市公司社会责任竞争力差异评估研究[J].生态经济,2014(11):70-74.
[35]陶莹.白酒企业社会责任与竞争力关系的实证研究——以价值链为视角[J].西南交通大学学报(社会科学版),2018(1):107-114.
[36]王秋丽,陈谨.白酒行业上市公司综合效率分析[J].中国管理科学,2014(S1):610-616.
[37]曾绍伦,王强.白酒上市公司质量评价及高质量发展路径研究[J].四川轻化工大学学报(社会科学版),2020(2):18-32.
[38] Dag姚deviren M, Yavuz S, Kllnlc, N. Weapon selection using the AHP and TOPSIS methods under fuzzy environment[J]. Expert Systems with Applications, 2009(4):8143-8151.
[39]朱方霞,陈华友.民生工程综合绩效的TOPSIS评价[J].统计与决策,2020(6):182-184.
[40]李彦斌,于心怡,王致杰.采用灰色关联度与TOPSIS法的光伏发电项目风险评价研究[J].电网技术,2013(6):1514-1519.
[41] Hoffecker J, Goldenberg C. Using the balanced scorecard to develop companywide performance measures[J]. Journal of Cost Management, 1994(3):5-17.
[42]周虹,李端生,张苇锟.战略性企业社会责任与企业绩效:顾此失彼还是两全其美?[J].经济与管理研究,2019(6):131-144.
[43]王爱娜,魏顺泽.企业可持续发展财务评价指标体系构建[J].财会通讯,2009(35):65-66.
[44]毛淑珍,乐国林,吴阳慧.基于平衡计分卡的M企业社会责任评价[J].财务与会计,2017(8):56-58.
[45]耿晶晶,刘莉.商业生态系统中核心企业财务绩效评价[J].管理现代化,2019(3):67-69.
[46]李琛,曾祥凤,凌泽华.白酒品牌生态系统健康评价指标体系设计与评价方法[J].企业经济,2015(8):44-48.
[47]汪榜江,黄建华.企业可持续发展评价体系构建——基于环境、社会和治理因素[J].财会月刊,2020(9):109-118.
[48]陈翔,肖序.企业循环经济评价指标体系构建与精度测算[J].统计与决策,2019(12):169-172.
[49]陈建兵,申建芳,陈平华,等.高新技术企业综合竞争力监测指标设计及归类分析[J].科技管理研究,2019(19):83-89.
[50]王先甲,汪磊.基于马氏距离的改进型TOPSIS在供应商选择中的应用[J].控制与决策,2012(10):1566-1570.
[51]商丽媛,谭清美.基于灰熵模型的应急物流供应商评价[J].统计与决策,2013(3):45-47.
[52]徐国祥,檀向球,胡穗华.上市公司经营业绩综合评价及其实证研究[J].统计研究,2000(9):44-51.
[53]慕静,韩文秀,朱磊.基于向量夹角余弦的优势产业国际竞争力模糊评价模型[J].系统管理学报,2008(3):256-260.
[54]张和平,解晓龙.基于灰色关联度的组合优化模型研究[J].统计与决策,2019(9):19-23.
[55] Yong-Huang Lin, Chih-Chiang Chiu, Pin-Chan Lee, etc. Applying fuzzy grey modification model on inflow forecasting[J]. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 2012(4):734-743.
[56]刘健,卜炎,姜子玉,等.基于灰色关联TOPSIS法的地热资源开发选区评价[J].中国矿业,2019(9):153-159.
[57]吴卫星,王晨宇,屈源育.企业履行社会责任影响因素研究——基于管理人员研究经历的视角[J].金融论坛,2020(5):46-56.
[58]边卫军.鼓励民营企业切实履行社会责任[J].人民论坛,2019(24):32-33.
[59]杨宝臣,陈跃.基于变权和TOPSIS方法的灰色关联决策模型[J].系统工程,2011(6):106-112.
基本信息:
中图分类号:F426.82;F272.5
引用信息:
[1]陈一君,胡文莉,武志霞.白酒企业绩效评价指标体系构建与评价方法——基于BSC和熵权的改进TOPSIS模型[J].四川轻化工大学学报(社会科学版),2020,35(05):68-87.
基金信息:
四川省社科规划重大项目(SC19EZD049); 四川省科技计划软科学项目(2020JDR0239)
2020-10-20
2020-10-20