四川轻化工大学学报(社会科学版)

数字技术的深度嵌入持续推动基层治理的数字化转型。但应警惕的是，传统官僚主义作风依附于数字技术而发生异化行为，进而衍生出基层数字官僚主义现象。围绕基层数字官僚主义的负效应、发生逻辑和纠治路径，立足制度、技术、观念三维分析视角，构建基层数字官僚主义生成机理的系统性解释框架，深度剖析其多维生发机制。研究表明，在制度维度上，压力型体制的纵向倒逼逻辑与横向部门竞争的政绩博弈逻辑，构成数字官僚主义滋生的体制根源；在技术维度上，考核技术的非科学化、数字平台运行刚性化、技术应用与责任边界的关系模糊，形成数字官僚主义蔓延的技术诱因；在观念维度上，部分基层干部政绩观错位、权力观扭曲，人民立场的偏移、责任意识缺失及机会主义思维滋生，是数字官僚主义生成的内在思想根源。对此，拟从制度重塑、技术优化、观念纠偏三个维度，构建整体性的纠治路径体系，旨在消解基层数字官僚主义的现实弊病，以使数字技术回归“治理与服务”的本源，推动基层数字治理提质增效，助力基层数字治理现代化建设。

The deep embedding of digital technology continues to drive the digital transformation of grassroots governance. However, it should be noted that traditional bureaucracy, when attached to digital technology, undergoes alienation and consequently gives rise to grassroots digital bureaucracy. Adopting a three-dimensional analytical framework encompassing institutional, technological, and ideational dimensions, this paper constructs a systematic explanatory framework for the generative mechanism of grassroots digital bureaucracy and provides an in-depth analysis of its multi-dimensional occurrence mechanisms. The findings reveal that, at the institutional level, the vertical top-down pressure of the pressure-based system and the performance competition logic among horizontal sectoral departments constitute the institutional roots of digital bureaucracy. At the technological level, the unscientific design of assessment tools, the rigid operation of digital platforms, and the blurred boundaries between technological application and governance responsibilities serve as technological triggers for the proliferation of digital bureaucracy. At the ideational level, some grassroots officials' misplaced view on official performance, distorted view of power, deviation from the peoplecentered stance, lack of accountability, and the emergence of opportunistic thinking are the internal ideological roots of digital bureaucracy. To address this, a holistic corrective pathway system should be constructed from three dimensions: institutional restructuring, technological optimization, and ideational correction. This system aims to eliminate the practical maladies of grassroots digital bureaucracy, return digital technology to its original purpose of “governance and service”, improve the quality and efficiency of grassroots digital governance, and ultimately contribute to the modernization of grassroots digital governance.